The purpose of the PIC was to:

• Display and seek input on the screening evaluation of the Preliminary Route Alternatives

• Display and seek input on the feasible route alternatives

• Answer questions about the study

The Public Information Centres were a drop-in format. However, a brief overview of the study and PIC materials were provided on the hour each evening. 

The second round of Public Information Centres (PICs) was held on:
 

Public Information Centre 2 Materials
Please note: Some of the files are large and may take several minutes to load.

• Welcome Panel 1.9 Mb
• The Study 1.6 Mb
• The Study Process 2.0 Mb
• Evaluation of Feasible Route Alternatives 1.1 Mb
• Evaluation Criteria 2.1 Mb
• Existing Conditions and Feasible Route Alternatives
  High Resolution 9.7 Mb Low Resolution 4.0 Mb
• Screening of Preliminary Route Alternatives
  High Resolution 10.0 Mb Low Resolution 3.4 Mb
• Design Standards 1.2 Mb
• Four-Laning Strategies 2.0 Mb
• Alternative AB1 
  High Resolution 18.8 Mb Low Resolution 3.8 Mb
• Alternative AB2 
  High Resolution 19.1 Mb Low Resolution 3.8 Mb
• Alternative AB3 
  High Resolution 19.1 Mb Low Resolution 3.8 Mb
• Alternative BCD1
  High Resolution 21.7 Mb Low Resolution 3.8 Mb
• Alternative BCD2
  High Resolution 22.0 Mb Low Resolution 3.8 Mb
• Alternative BCD3
  High Resolution 21.9 Mb Low Resolution 3.8 Mb
• Alternative BCD4
  High Resolution 21.8 Mb Low Resolution 3.8 Mb
• Highway 102 Connection Alternatives
  High Resolution 2.5 Mb Low Resolution 0.4 Mb
• Possible Interim Improvement Plan (Kakabeka Falls)
  High Resolution 4.8 Mb Low Resolution 1.8 Mb
• Next Steps 1.3 Mb
• Comment Sheet 0.1 Mb